Hello guest, if you read this it means you are not registered. Click here to register in a few simple steps, you will enjoy all features of our Forum.
Rules have been updated! Here

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

[-]
Tags
to us in companies ai agree the seven safeguards

Seven AI companies agree to safeguards in the US
#1
Seven AI companies agree to safeguards in the US

[b]Seven leading companies in artificial intelligence have committed to managing risks posed by the tech, the White House has said.[/b]

This will include testing the security of AI, and making the results of those tests public.

Representatives from Amazon, Anthropic, Google, Inflection, Meta, Microsoft, and OpenAI joined US President Joe Biden to make the announcement.

It follows a number of warnings about the capabilities of the technology.

The pace at which the companies have been developing their tools have prompted fears over the spread of disinformation, especially in the run up to the 2024 US presidential election.

"We must be clear-eyed and vigilant about the threats emerging from emerging technologies that can pose - don't have to but can pose - to our democracy and our values," President Joe Biden said during remarks on Friday.

On Wednesday, Meta, Facebook's parent company, announced its own AI tool called Llama 2.

Sir Nick Clegg, president of global affairs at Meta, told the BBC the "hype has somewhat run ahead of the technology".

As part of the agreement signed on Friday, the companies agreed to:
  • Security testing of their AI systems by internal and external experts before their release.

  • Ensuring that people are able to spot AI by implementing watermarks.

  • Publicly reporting AI capabilities and limitations on a regular basis.

  • Researching the risks such as bias, discrimination and the invasion of privacy.
The goal is for it to be easy for people to tell when online content is created by AI, the White House added.

"This is a serious responsibility, we have to get it right," Mr Biden said. "And there's enormous, enormous potential upside as well."

Watermarks for AI-generated content were among topics EU commissioner Thierry Breton discussed with OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman during a June visit to San Francisco.

"Looking forward to pursuing our discussions - notably on watermarking," Breton wrote in a tweet that included a video snippet of him and Mr Altman.

In the video clip Mr Altman said he "would love to show" what OpenAI was doing with watermarks "very soon."
The voluntary safeguards signed on Friday are a step towards more robust regulation around AI in the US.

The administration is also working on an executive order, it said in a statement.

The White House said it would also work with allies to establish an international framework to govern the development and use of AI.

Warnings abut the technology include that it could be used to generate misinformation and destabilise society, and even that it could pose an existential risk to humanity - although some ground-breaking computer scientists have said apocalyptic warnings are overblown.
Reply
#2
Finally someone realized about the problems the AI might arise in the near future
Reply
#3
Honestly, my first reaction to this is a mix of relief and some serious skepticism. It's about time these companies were publicly put on the spot about the risks, but a voluntary "agreement" can't help but feel like a well-timed PR move.
Let's be real: this is them trying to write the rules of the game before the government steps in and writes a set they won't like. It's a smart play, and they get to look like the responsible good guys in the process. I get the strategy, but it makes you question how deep the commitment really goes.
And some of these promises just feel... hollow. Take watermarking. That sounds great on paper, but actually making it work is a massive technical headache. OpenAI couldn't even get their own text detector to work reliably before shutting it down, so how are they going to create some magic watermark that can't just be easily stripped out? I'm not convinced.
So yeah, call me a cynic, but I'm wary. I want this to be a real step forward, I really do. But I've seen enough corporate promises to know that a handshake agreement without any real enforcement is often just hot air. I'll believe it when I see it actually make a difference.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)